The Karnataka VAT (Amendment) Act, 2012 has omitted Section 30 of Karnataka VAT Act w.e.f. 1.4.2012. The effect of the said omission that a dealer can no more issue credit notes or debit notes altering his sales turnover. The amendment has been brought to nullify the judgement of Karnataka High Court in re Reliance Industries case wherein the Honourable High Court has clearly upheld that a dealer can give trade discount subsequent to issue of sales Invoice by way of issue of credit note which can have the effect of reducing the taxable turnover under the Act.
The effect of the said amendment is that trade discount can now be given by the dealer in the sales invoice only at the time of sale as laid down in Rule 3(2) of Karnataka VAT Rules. Such discounts can be given subsequent to issue of sales invoice also but the same shall not have effect of reducing the taxable turnover i.e., the selling dealer shall be not be entitled to vat credit in respect of such trade discount given.
Since the entire section has been omitted, a question now arises that if there any is a post sale event which has effect of reduction in sales turnover, how the same needs to be tackled? For Example, In case of sale of goods CIF, if the quantity or quality of goods received by the buyer is not as per the sale contract, then it shall have the effect of reduction of Invoice Price and must, therefore, result in reduction of corresponding VAT Liability also. But the same cannot happen pursuant to omission of Section 30 since it was the only provision which enabled the adjustment in taxable sales turnover pursuant to events arising after sale. There are many commodities whose prices fluctuates on daily basis. In such cases, it is not possible for the selling dealer to guard the effect of downward fluctuation in prices without issuing debit notes or credit notes.
The question remaining unanswered is as to how a dealer will be able to save loss of VAT on such transactions which were earlier allowed under section 30? While the Act provides that if there is any upward revision in price pursuant to post sale event, the same need to be brought within the purview of taxable turnover by issue of supplementary invoice but the vice versa is not true... the Government do not intend to pass on the tax benefit of reduction in price to the consumers.
This amendment is bound to be questioned before the court of law as to its validity and till then more litigations and harrassments are expected on the said issue until the same is settled by Judiciary or the Government.